Can an attorney represent a client even when it conflicts with their own interests?

In the context of legal representation, it is essential to understand the principles of conflict of interest. An attorney may represent a client even when a conflict with their own interests arises, provided certain conditions are met. Specifically, if the attorney discloses the conflict to the client and obtains the client's informed consent, and the attorney reasonably believes they can represent the client competently and diligently, they are allowed to proceed with the representation.

This approach is rooted in ethical guidelines that balance the attorney's obligation to avoid conflicts with the rights of clients to choose their representatives. It emphasizes the importance of transparency and the necessity for the client to understand the implications of allowing the attorney to take on such representation.

When the client consents, it indicates an understanding of the potential risks involved, allowing for the possibility of continued representation. Therefore, the premise that an attorney can represent a client in the presence of a conflict of interest, provided there is consent and a belief in the ability to manage the situation effectively, aligns with widely accepted ethical standards in legal practice.