Can limitations and examples in the Specification restrict the coverage possible by Claims?

The correct answer is that limitations and examples in the Specification can indeed impact the coverage possible by Claims. While it is true that the examples and limitations provided in the Specification do not explicitly restrict the Claims, they play a crucial role in how those Claims are interpreted. A well-crafted Specification may clarify the invention and its intended use, which can lead to a rejection if the Claims do not sufficiently enable the claimed invention across its full scope. This aligns with the enablement requirement that ensures the claims are supported by the disclosed information in the Specification.

Claims must be enabled by the Specification, and if the examples and limitations are too narrow or specific, they may lead to issues with sufficiency in meeting the requirements under patent laws. Therefore, while limitations do not outright restrict Claims, they function in a manner that can significantly influence their enforceability and the breadth of protection sought.

In contrast, the other options imply varying degrees of restriction or suggestion, which do not accurately represent how the relationship between the Specification and Claims works under patent law.