What aspect of a claim is highlighted in a Jepson Claim compared to standard claims?

A Jepson Claim is characterized by its unique structure where the prior art is described explicitly before detailing the innovative aspects of the claimed invention. This format serves to emphasize the differences between existing technology and the invention itself. By laying out the prior art first, the claim clearly delineates what is already known and then proceeds to specify what is new and non-obvious about the invention, thus enhancing the clarity of the claim regarding the points of novelty.

This approach can be particularly effective in patent examinations where distinguishing the inventive step from prior art is crucial. It helps patent examiners and others easily recognize the advancements made over existing technologies, making the claims potentially more defensible and easier to understand in terms of what the invention contributes to the field.

The other aspects mentioned do not accurately reflect the defining characteristics of a Jepson Claim. Simpler language in description (the second option) is not a hallmark of Jepson Claims; they can be complex given their structure. The third option regarding the placement of new claims is misleading, as Jepson Claims do not strictly place new ideas before old art. Lastly, the absence of particular structure (the fourth option) does not align with Jepson Claims, which specifically include a structural format to highlight prior art.