What type of example may be included to satisfy enablement criteria?

To satisfy enablement criteria in the context of patent applications, it is essential that the disclosure allows a person skilled in the art to make and use the claimed invention without undue experimentation. The inclusion of both working examples and prophetic examples is acceptable for meeting this requirement.

Working examples demonstrate actual embodiments of the invention, showing how the invention can be practiced successfully. Prophetic examples, on the other hand, describe hypothetical scenarios or future applications of the invention based on established principles, even though they have not yet been realized or tested. Both types contribute valuable insight into the practical application of the invention, thus aiding in meeting the enablement standard outlined in patent law.

This dual approach ensures that the disclosed invention is more comprehensively understood, catering to varying levels of skill and knowledge within the field. Consequently, including either working examples or prophetic examples provides a broader scope for satisfying enablement requirements as outlined in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP).